↓ Skip to main content

住民観察にもとつく快適環境指標の開発

Overview of attention for article published in ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
住民観察にもとつく快適環境指標の開発
Published in
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, June 2010
DOI 10.11353/sesj1988.3.85
Authors

原科 幸彦, 田中 充, 内藤 正明

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2023.
All research outputs
#17,637,892
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
#19
of 41 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,220
of 105,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 41 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one scored the same or higher as 22 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,035 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.