The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Case for Regime-based Water Quality Standards
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BioScience, February 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0155:tcfrwq]2.0.co;2 |
| Authors |
Geoffrey C. Poole, Jason B. Dunham, Druscilla M. Keenan, Sally T. Sauter, Dale A. McCullough, Christopher Mebane, Jeffrey C. Lockwood, Don A. Essig, Mark P. Hicks, Debra J. Sturdevant, Elizabeth J. Materna, Shelley A. Spalding, John Risley, Marianne Deppman |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 3% |
| Austria | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 115 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 29 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 12% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 12 | 9% |
| Other | 23 | 18% |
| Unknown | 16 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 44 | 35% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 34 | 27% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 14 | 11% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 22 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2014.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BioScience
#1,544
of 2,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,615
of 146,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioScience
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,585 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 41.9. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 146,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.