The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A New Species of Alpinia (Zingiberaceae: subgenus Alpinia subsect. Catimbium) from Laos and Vietnam
|
---|---|
Published in |
Bulletin of the National Museum of Nature and Science. Series B, Botany, February 2023
|
DOI | 10.50826/bnmnsbot.49.1_25 |
Authors |
Nobuyuki Tanaka, Viet Hoang, Van Tran Thi Kieu, Trinh Tram Nguyen Khanh, Shuichiro Tagane, Hidenobu Funakoshi, Phetlasy Souladeth |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 8 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 89% |
Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2023.
All research outputs
#2,958,531
of 26,184,895 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of the National Museum of Nature and Science. Series B, Botany
#2
of 17 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,235
of 432,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of the National Museum of Nature and Science. Series B, Botany
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,184,895 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one scored the same or higher as 15 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them