The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Estimating methane production rates in bogs and landfills by deuterium enrichment of pore water
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Global Biogeochemical Cycles, December 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1029/2000gb001329 |
| Authors |
D. I. Siegel, J. R. Chanton, P. H. Glaser, L. S. Chasar, D. O. Rosenberry |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 38 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 27% |
| Researcher | 7 | 17% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 15% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 5 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 21 | 51% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2021.
All research outputs
#8,160,367
of 24,464,848 outputs
Outputs from Global Biogeochemical Cycles
#1,006
of 1,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,709
of 129,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Biogeochemical Cycles
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,464,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,715 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,499 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.