↓ Skip to main content

空中スギ花粉の着衣, 皮膚への付着

Overview of attention for article published in Arerugī Allergy, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#48 of 491)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
空中スギ花粉の着衣, 皮膚への付着
Published in
Arerugī Allergy, February 2017
DOI 10.15036/arerugi.54.555
Authors

奥田 稔, 大久保 公裕, 後藤 穣, 石田 裕子

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2023.
All research outputs
#7,367,069
of 26,332,460 outputs
Outputs from Arerugī Allergy
#48
of 491 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,574
of 433,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arerugī Allergy
#29
of 235 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,332,460 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 491 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 235 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.