The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Lethal levels of selected water quality variables to larval and juvenile Lost River and shortnose suckers
|
---|---|
Published in |
Environmental Pollution, April 1999
|
DOI | 10.1016/s0269-7491(98)00212-7 |
Authors |
M.K Saiki, D.P Monda, B.L Bellerud |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 17% |
Other | 3 | 13% |
Librarian | 2 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 9% |
Other | 2 | 9% |
Unknown | 8 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 7 | 30% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 22% |
Psychology | 1 | 4% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Chemistry | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 8 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2004.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Pollution
#3,443
of 13,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,943
of 37,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Pollution
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,433 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 37,037 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.