The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Modeling CO2 degassing and pH in a stream–aquifer system
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Hydrology, August 1998
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0022-1694(98)00093-6 |
| Authors |
J Choi, S.M Hulseapple, M.H Conklin, J.W Harvey |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 91 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 27% |
| Researcher | 17 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 11% |
| Professor | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 18% |
| Unknown | 12 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 26 | 27% |
| Environmental Science | 18 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 16% |
| Engineering | 9 | 9% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 17 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2008.
All research outputs
#8,813,966
of 26,052,823 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Hydrology
#1,480
of 8,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,187
of 31,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Hydrology
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,052,823 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,827 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 31,542 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.