The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Acute toxicity of fire‐retardant and foam‐suppressant chemicals to Hyalella azteca (Saussure)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry, October 2009
|
DOI | 10.1002/etc.5620160706 |
Authors |
Susan F. McDonald, Steven J. Hamilton, Kevin J. Buhl, James F. Heisinger |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 33% |
Researcher | 2 | 33% |
Other | 2 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 67% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 17% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2023.
All research outputs
#2,847,000
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry
#323
of 5,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,772
of 108,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry
#43
of 1,394 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,103 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,394 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.