The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Methods for predicting peak discharge of floods caused by failure of natural and constructed earthen dams
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Water Resources Research, October 1997
|
| DOI | 10.1029/97wr01616 |
| Authors |
Joseph S. Walder, Jim E. O'Connor |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 3 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 118 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 21% |
| Researcher | 23 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 31 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 38 | 31% |
| Engineering | 37 | 30% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | <1% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 36 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2017.
All research outputs
#8,162,549
of 24,471,305 outputs
Outputs from Water Resources Research
#1,955
of 5,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,856
of 31,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Water Resources Research
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,471,305 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,107 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 31,197 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.