The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 532 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Understanding ‘it depends’ in ecology: a guide to hypothesising, visualising and interpreting statistical interactions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Reviews, March 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1111/brv.12939 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rebecca Spake, Diana E. Bowler, Corey T. Callaghan, Shane A. Blowes, C. Patrick Doncaster, Laura H. Antão, Shinichi Nakagawa, Richard McElreath, Jonathan M. Chase |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 36 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 27 | 5% |
| Germany | 12 | 2% |
| France | 10 | 2% |
| Canada | 6 | 1% |
| Brazil | 6 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 5 | <1% |
| India | 4 | <1% |
| Australia | 4 | <1% |
| Other | 37 | 7% |
| Unknown | 385 | 72% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 266 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 248 | 47% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 12 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 289 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 289 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 61 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 55 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 40 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 9% |
| Other | 10 | 3% |
| Other | 35 | 12% |
| Unknown | 63 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 116 | 40% |
| Environmental Science | 59 | 20% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 2% |
| Engineering | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 6% |
| Unknown | 77 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 187. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2023.
All research outputs
#228,118
of 26,560,265 outputs
Outputs from Biological Reviews
#41
of 1,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,779
of 432,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Reviews
#2
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,560,265 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,629 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.