The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Factors influencing the height of Hawaiian lava fountains: implications for the use of fountain height as an indicator of magma gas content
|
---|---|
Published in |
Bulletin of Volcanology, December 1995
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf00300988 |
Authors |
E. A. Parfitt, L. Wilson, C. A. Neal |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Italy | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 49 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 19 | 37% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 24% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 12% |
Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
Professor | 2 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 5 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 40 | 78% |
Unknown | 11 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2022.
All research outputs
#5,968,216
of 23,563,389 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Volcanology
#276
of 1,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,237
of 79,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Volcanology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,563,389 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,111 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,907 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them