↓ Skip to main content

Implications for faunal habitat related to altered macrophyte structure in regulated lakes in northern Minnesota

Overview of attention for article published in Wetlands, December 1992
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Implications for faunal habitat related to altered macrophyte structure in regulated lakes in northern Minnesota
Published in
Wetlands, December 1992
DOI 10.1007/bf03160609
Authors

Douglas A. Wolcox, James E. Meeker

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 6%
United Kingdom 1 2%
India 1 2%
Peru 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 46 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 26%
Student > Master 8 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Other 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 11 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 36%
Environmental Science 17 32%
Engineering 2 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 12 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 1999.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Wetlands
#340
of 1,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,280
of 65,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wetlands
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,431 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,917 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them