The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
An interpretation of induced electric currents in long pipelines caused by natural geomagnetic sources of the upper atmosphere
|
---|---|
Published in |
Surveys in Geophysics, September 1986
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf01904061 |
Authors |
Wallace H. Campbell |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | 14% |
Ireland | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 11 | 79% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 21% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 14% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 50% |
Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 14% |
Mathematics | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 114. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2024.
All research outputs
#385,587
of 26,163,973 outputs
Outputs from Surveys in Geophysics
#5
of 326 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25
of 10,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surveys in Geophysics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,163,973 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 326 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 10,672 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them