↓ Skip to main content

Uptake, biotransformation, and elimination of rotenone by bluegills (Lepomis macrochirus)

Overview of attention for article published in Aquatic Toxicology, May 1985
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Uptake, biotransformation, and elimination of rotenone by bluegills (Lepomis macrochirus)
Published in
Aquatic Toxicology, May 1985
DOI 10.1016/0166-445x(85)90003-7
Authors

W.H. Gingerich, J.J. Rach

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 40%
Researcher 2 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Librarian 1 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 50%
Arts and Humanities 1 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 10%
Environmental Science 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2022.
All research outputs
#8,551,787
of 25,416,581 outputs
Outputs from Aquatic Toxicology
#626
of 2,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,763
of 9,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aquatic Toxicology
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,416,581 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,667 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 9,444 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.