The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The high-strength and toughness Janus bionic periosteum matching bone development and growth in children
|
---|---|
Published in |
Composites: Part B, Engineering, May 2023
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.110642 |
Authors |
Zhiqiang Zhang, Luhan Bao, Chuang Qian, Meison Furtado, Haodong Li, Shangyu Guo, Yiming Zheng, Dong Fu, Kuiran Dong, Wenguo Cui, Dahui Wang |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 20% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 20% |
Student > Master | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 20% |
Materials Science | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2023.
All research outputs
#5,128,331
of 26,522,299 outputs
Outputs from Composites: Part B, Engineering
#74
of 1,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,177
of 418,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Composites: Part B, Engineering
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,522,299 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,118 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.