↓ Skip to main content

Development of multiple AI pipelines that predict neoadjuvant chemotherapy response of breast cancer using H

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 225)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development of multiple AI pipelines that predict neoadjuvant chemotherapy response of breast cancer using H&E‐stained tissues
Published in
The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research, March 2023
DOI 10.1002/cjp2.314
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bin Shen, Akira Saito, Ai Ueda, Koji Fujita, Yui Nagamatsu, Mikihiro Hashimoto, Masaharu Kobayashi, Aashiq H Mirza, Hans Peter Graf, Eric Cosatto, Shoichi Hazama, Hiroaki Nagano, Eiichi Sato, Jun Matsubayashi, Toshitaka Nagao, Esther Cheng, Syed AF Hoda, Takashi Ishikawa, Masahiko Kuroda

Abstract

In recent years, the treatment of breast cancer has advanced dramatically and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has become a common treatment method, especially for locally advanced breast cancer. However, other than the subtype of breast cancer, no clear factor indicating sensitivity to NAC has been identified. In this study, we attempted to use artificial intelligence (AI) to predict the effect of preoperative chemotherapy from hematoxylin and eosin images of pathological tissue obtained from needle biopsies prior to chemotherapy. Application of AI to pathological images typically uses a single machine-learning model such as support vector machines (SVMs) or deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs). However, cancer tissues are extremely diverse and learning with a realistic number of cases limits the prediction accuracy of a single model. In this study, we propose a novel pipeline system that uses three independent models each focusing on different characteristics of cancer atypia. Our system uses a CNN model to learn structural atypia from image patches and SVM and random forest models to learn nuclear atypia from fine-grained nuclear features extracted by image analysis methods. It was able to predict the NAC response with 95.15% accuracy on a test set of 103 unseen cases. We believe that this AI pipeline system will contribute to the adoption of personalized medicine in NAC therapy for breast cancer.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Professor 1 5%
Student > Postgraduate 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 16 76%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 2 10%
Materials Science 1 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Unknown 16 76%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,278,320
of 26,419,306 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research
#6
of 225 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,920
of 432,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,419,306 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,901 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them