↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of the OPTIVUS-Complex PCI Multivessel Cohort With the Historical CREDO-Kyoto Registry Cohort-3

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation Journal, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of the OPTIVUS-Complex PCI Multivessel Cohort With the Historical CREDO-Kyoto Registry Cohort-3
Published in
Circulation Journal, March 2023
DOI 10.1253/circj.cj-22-0837
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ko Yamamoto, Hiroki Shiomi, Takeshi Morimoto, Hiroki Watanabe, Akiyoshi Miyazawa, Kyohei Yamaji, Masanobu Ohya, Sunao Nakamura, Satoru Mitomo, Satoru Suwa, Takenori Domei, Shojiro Tatsushima, Koh Ono, Hiroki Sakamoto, Kiyotaka Shimamura, Masataka Shigetoshi, Ryoji Taniguchi, Yuji Nishimoto, Hideki Okayama, Kensho Matsuda, Kenji Nakatsuma, Yohei Takayama, Jun Kuribara, Hidekuni Kirigaya, Kohei Yoneda, Yuta Imai, Umihiko Kaneko, Hiroshi Ueda, Kota Komiyama, Naotaka Okamoto, Satoru Sasaki, Kengo Tanabe, Mitsuru Abe, Kiyoshi Hibi, Kazushige Kadota, Kenji Ando, Takeshi Kimura, on behalf of the OPTIVUS-Complex PCI Investigators

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 29%
Unspecified 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 43%
Unspecified 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2023.
All research outputs
#5,539,643
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Circulation Journal
#268
of 2,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,419
of 427,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation Journal
#5
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,360 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.