↓ Skip to main content

Prasugrel Monotherapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Biodegradable-Polymer Platinum-Chromium Everolimus Eluting Stent for Japanese Patients With Chronic Coronary Syndrome (ASET-JAPAN)

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation Journal, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
30 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prasugrel Monotherapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Biodegradable-Polymer Platinum-Chromium Everolimus Eluting Stent for Japanese Patients With Chronic Coronary Syndrome (ASET-JAPAN)
Published in
Circulation Journal, March 2023
DOI 10.1253/circj.cj-23-0051
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takashi Muramatsu, Shinichiro Masuda, Nozomi Kotoku, Ken Kozuma, Hideyuki Kawashima, Yuki Ishibashi, Gaku Nakazawa, Kuniaki Takahashi, Takayuki Okamura, Yosuke Miyazaki, Hiroki Tateishi, Masato Nakamura, Norihiro Kogame, Taku Asano, Shimpei Nakatani, Yoshihiro Morino, Yuki Katagiri, Kai Ninomiya, Shigetaka Kageyama, Hiroshi Takahashi, Scot Garg, Shengxian Tu, Kengo Tanabe, Yukio Ozaki, Patrick W Serruys, Yoshinobu Onuma

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 14%
Student > Master 2 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Researcher 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 29%
Sports and Recreations 1 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Unknown 8 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,973,106
of 26,748,235 outputs
Outputs from Circulation Journal
#79
of 2,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,036
of 435,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation Journal
#2
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,748,235 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,461 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,725 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.