↓ Skip to main content

Palæomagnetic Evidence Relevant to a Change in the Earth's Radius

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, January 1961
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Palæomagnetic Evidence Relevant to a Change in the Earth's Radius
Published in
Nature, January 1961
DOI 10.1038/189045a0
Authors

ALLAN COX, RICHARD R. DOELL

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2019.
All research outputs
#7,492,850
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#65,514
of 91,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#619
of 7,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#17
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 91,117 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 99.4. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 7,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.