The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 136 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
CRISPR-Cas9-mediated knockout of CYP79D1 and CYP79D2 in cassava attenuates toxic cyanogen production
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, March 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2022.1079254 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael A. Gomez, Kodiak C. Berkoff, Baljeet K. Gill, Anthony T. Iavarone, Samantha E. Lieberman, Jessica M., Alex Schultink, Nicholas G. Karavolias, Stacia K. Wyman, Raj Deepika Chauhan, Nigel J. Taylor, Brian J. Staskawicz, Myeong-Je Cho, Daniel S. Rokhsar, Jessica B. Lyons |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 22 | 16% |
| United States | 4 | 3% |
| Belgium | 2 | 1% |
| Congo, The Democratic Republic of the | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 102 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 126 | 93% |
| Scientists | 8 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Researcher | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 27 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 16% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 27 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 105. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2024.
All research outputs
#428,296
of 26,503,921 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#73
of 25,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,206
of 445,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#2
of 1,145 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,503,921 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,317 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,422 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,145 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.