The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Understanding non-economic loss and damage due to climate change in Ghana
|
---|---|
Published in |
Climate and Development, March 2023
|
DOI | 10.1080/17565529.2023.2183074 |
Authors |
James Boafo, Thomas Yeboah, Lawrence Guodaar, Yamoah Stephanie, Hanson Nyantakyi-Frimpong |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 3 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 9% |
Researcher | 2 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 9% |
Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 17% |
Unknown | 9 | 39% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 4 | 17% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 13% |
Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 13% |
Unknown | 8 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 88. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2023.
All research outputs
#465,905
of 24,917,903 outputs
Outputs from Climate and Development
#12
of 722 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,581
of 411,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climate and Development
#2
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,917,903 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 722 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 411,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.