↓ Skip to main content

The Associate Editor in the peer review process—what's that?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Wildlife Management, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Associate Editor in the peer review process—what's that?
Published in
Journal of Wildlife Management, March 2023
DOI 10.1002/jwmg.22395
Authors

Kerry L. Nicholson, Cynthia Paszkowski, Amy J. Kuenzi, Kathryn A. Schoenecker, Evelyn H. Merrill

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2023.
All research outputs
#18,298,806
of 23,511,526 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wildlife Management
#2,029
of 2,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,964
of 284,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wildlife Management
#17
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,511,526 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,389 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,629 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.