The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A comparison of 3 methods for assessing raptor diet during the breeding season
|
---|---|
Published in |
Wildlife Society Bulletin, December 2010
|
DOI | 10.2193/0091-7648(2004)32[373:acomfa]2.0.co;2 |
Authors |
Stephen B. Lewis, Mark R. Fuller, Kimberly Titus |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 3 | 3% |
Brazil | 2 | 2% |
United States | 2 | 2% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
Slovakia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 106 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 23 | 20% |
Researcher | 21 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
Other | 6 | 5% |
Other | 18 | 16% |
Unknown | 19 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 63 | 54% |
Environmental Science | 24 | 21% |
Materials Science | 2 | 2% |
Unspecified | 1 | <1% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | <1% |
Other | 3 | 3% |
Unknown | 22 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2018.
All research outputs
#3,138,635
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Wildlife Society Bulletin
#124
of 1,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,048
of 191,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wildlife Society Bulletin
#6
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,046 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,076 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.