The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Predictive Accuracy of a Ground–Water Model — Lessons from a Postaudit
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ground Water, March 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1745-6584.1986.tb00993.x |
| Authors |
Leonard F. Konikow |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 18 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 21% |
| Researcher | 3 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 11% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Other | 3 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 37% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 26% |
| Engineering | 4 | 21% |
| Unknown | 3 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2006.
All research outputs
#8,229,139
of 24,652,720 outputs
Outputs from Ground Water
#247
of 885 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,450
of 71,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ground Water
#7
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,652,720 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 885 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,790 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.