The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Quality use of research evidence: practitioner perspectives
|
---|---|
Published in |
Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, August 2023
|
DOI | 10.1332/174426421x16778434724277 |
Authors |
Joanne Gleeson, Mark Rickinson, Lucas Walsh, Blake Cutler, Mandy Salisbury, Genevieve Hall, Hang Khong |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 4 | 12% |
United States | 3 | 9% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
Belgium | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 23 | 70% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 22 | 67% |
Scientists | 11 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 30% |
Librarian | 1 | 10% |
Other | 1 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 10% |
Lecturer | 1 | 10% |
Other | 2 | 20% |
Unknown | 1 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 3 | 30% |
Computer Science | 2 | 20% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 10% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 10% |
Chemistry | 1 | 10% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,445,892
of 26,171,302 outputs
Outputs from Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice
#63
of 497 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,709
of 366,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,171,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 497 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them