↓ Skip to main content

Association of seasonal reproductive patterns with changing food availability in an equatorial carnivore, the spotted hyaena (Crocuta crocuta)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Reproduction & Fertility, May 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Association of seasonal reproductive patterns with changing food availability in an equatorial carnivore, the spotted hyaena (Crocuta crocuta)
Published in
Journal of Reproduction & Fertility, May 1999
DOI 10.1530/jrf.0.1160087
Pubmed ID
Authors

K E Holekamp, M Szykman, E E Boydston, L Smale

Abstract

Reproductive seasonality was examined in an equatorial population of free-living spotted hyaenas (Crocuta crocuta) in Kenya. The study population was observed continuously for 10 years, during which time the dates of all births, conceptions, weanings, and cub deaths were recorded. Local prey abundance was estimated two to four times per month, and rainfall was recorded daily throughout the study period. Births occurred during every month of the year, but a distinct trough in births occurred from February to May. This trough occurred approximately one gestation period after the phase of the annual cycle during which prey animals were least abundant in the home range of the hyaenas, and conceptions occurred most frequently when food abundance was greatest. Neither rainfall nor cub mortality were correlated with births or conceptions. Thus, although spotted hyaenas are capable of breeding throughout the year, they exhibit a moderate degree of seasonality that most likely reflects responses to seasonal variation in energy availability.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Brazil 3 2%
India 3 2%
Czechia 2 1%
Spain 2 1%
United Arab Emirates 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 130 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 38 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 22%
Student > Master 20 13%
Other 14 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 14 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 90 60%
Environmental Science 33 22%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 1%
Social Sciences 2 1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 16 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2004.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Reproduction & Fertility
#233
of 940 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,894
of 36,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Reproduction & Fertility
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 940 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 36,588 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them