The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Consumption and growth of hybrid grass carp fed four vegetation diets and trout chow in circular tanks*
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Fish Biology, January 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1983.tb04228.x |
| Authors |
J. V. Shireman, R. W. Rottmann, F. J. Aldridge |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 9 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 50% |
| Other | 2 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 50% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 20% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 1992.
All research outputs
#8,226,673
of 24,647,023 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Fish Biology
#1,631
of 4,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,496
of 161,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Fish Biology
#27
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,647,023 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,991 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,462 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.