The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 98 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prerequisites for coexistence: human pressure and refuge habitat availability shape continental-scale habitat use patterns of a large carnivore
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Landscape Ecology, March 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10980-023-01645-7 |
| Authors |
Julian Oeser, Marco Heurich, Stephanie Kramer-Schadt, Henrik Andrén, Guna Bagrade, Elisa Belotti, Luděk Bufka, Christine Breitenmoser-Würsten, Rok Černe, Martin Duľa, Christian Fuxjäger, Tomislav Gomerčić, Włodzimierz Jędrzejewski, Raido Kont, Petr Koubek, Rafał Kowalczyk, Miha Krofel, Jarmila Krojerová-Prokešová, Jakub Kubala, Josip Kusak, Miroslav Kutal, John D. C. Linnell, Jenny Mattisson, Anja Molinari-Jobin, Peep Männil, John Odden, Henryk Okarma, Teresa Oliveira, Nives Pagon, Jens Persson, Jaanus Remm, Krzysztof Schmidt, Sven Signer, Branislav Tám, Kristina Vogt, Fridolin Zimmermann, Tobias Kuemmerle |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 4% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 86 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 78 | 80% |
| Scientists | 17 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 11% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 12 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 42% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 17% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 12 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2024.
All research outputs
#772,308
of 26,563,746 outputs
Outputs from Landscape Ecology
#50
of 1,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,736
of 432,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Landscape Ecology
#2
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,563,746 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,808 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,666 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.