↓ Skip to main content

ノロウイルスGII群の牡蠣への蓄積特性:遺伝子型GII.2とGII.4の比較

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. G (Environmental Research), March 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ノロウイルスGII群の牡蠣への蓄積特性:遺伝子型GII.2とGII.4の比較
Published in
Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. G (Environmental Research), March 2023
DOI 10.2208/jscejer.78.7_iii_23
Authors

米田 一路, 齋藤 美樹, 西山 正晃, 植木 洋, 坂上 亜希恵, 渡部 徹

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2023.
All research outputs
#17,874,772
of 26,171,302 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. G (Environmental Research)
#26
of 55 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,170
of 431,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. G (Environmental Research)
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,171,302 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 55 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,324 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them