↓ Skip to main content

血糖コントロールが極めて困難な2型糖尿病患者が注意欠如/多動性障害と判明した1例

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Japan Diabetes Society, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
血糖コントロールが極めて困難な2型糖尿病患者が注意欠如/多動性障害と判明した1例
Published in
Journal of the Japan Diabetes Society, May 2014
DOI 10.11213/tonyobyo.57.256
Authors

神内 謙至, 橋本 善隆, 新美 美貴子, 山下 亜希, 山内 光子, 四井 真由美, 西田 なほみ, 山崎 徹, 早川 太朗, 中山 英夫, 槻本 康人, 並河 孝, 笹田 侑子, 前林 佳朗, 高橋 正洋, 磯野 元秀

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2023.
All research outputs
#17,637,892
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Japan Diabetes Society
#92
of 173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,487
of 241,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Japan Diabetes Society
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 173 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them