↓ Skip to main content

AAV analysis by sedimentation velocity analytical ultracentrifugation: beyond empty and full capsids

Overview of attention for article published in European Biophysics Journal, April 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
AAV analysis by sedimentation velocity analytical ultracentrifugation: beyond empty and full capsids
Published in
European Biophysics Journal, April 2023
DOI 10.1007/s00249-023-01646-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexander E. Yarawsky, Valeria Zai-Rose, Hazel M. Cunningham, John W. Burgner, Michael T. DeLion, Lake N. Paul

Abstract

The recent surge of therapeutic interest in recombinant adeno-associated viral (AAV) vectors for targeted DNA delivery has brought analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC) into the spotlight. A major concern during formulation of AAV therapeutics is purity of the active species (DNA-containing capsid, or "filled capsids"). Insertion of DNA into AAV is not a highly efficient process; thus, a significant amount of empty and partial/intermediate AAV molecules may exist. Recent guidance from the FDA includes limiting the presence of empty AAV capsids and other impurities to reduce immunotoxicity. While chromatographic techniques (SEC, SEC-MALS, AEX) are often used for empty and full capsid quantitation due to the ease of accessibility and familiarity among most biochemists, the resolution and sensitivity attained by sedimentation velocity (SV-AUC) in the formulation buffer and purification buffers is unmatched. Approaches for using SV-AUC to determine the empty-to-full capsid ratio have already been discussed by others; however, in this report, we focus on the importance of characterizing other impurities, such as free DNA, partially filled capsids, and aggregates that are recognized as species of concern for immunotoxicity. We also demonstrate the usefulness of applying multiple analyses (e.g., c(s), g(s*), WDA) in confirming the presence of and determining the hydrodynamic parameters of these various species.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 17%
Unspecified 1 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 12 67%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 11%
Arts and Humanities 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Chemistry 1 6%
Unknown 13 72%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2023.
All research outputs
#13,894,743
of 23,565,002 outputs
Outputs from European Biophysics Journal
#289
of 498 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,472
of 246,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Biophysics Journal
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,565,002 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 498 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,064 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them