↓ Skip to main content

Three years of wastewater surveillance for new psychoactive substances from 16 countries

Overview of attention for article published in Water Research X, April 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 141)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
33 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Three years of wastewater surveillance for new psychoactive substances from 16 countries
Published in
Water Research X, April 2023
DOI 10.1016/j.wroa.2023.100179
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard Bade, Nikolaos Rousis, Sangeet Adhikari, Christine Baduel, Lubertus Bijlsma, Erasmia Bizani, Tim Boogaerts, Daniel A. Burgard, Sara Castiglioni, Andrew Chappell, Adrian Covaci, Erin M. Driver, Fernando Fabriz Sodre, Despo Fatta-Kassinos, Aikaterini Galani, Cobus Gerber, Emma Gracia-Lor, Elisa Gracia-Marín, Rolf U. Halden, Ester Heath, Felix Hernandez, Emma Jaunay, Foon Yin Lai, Heon-Jun Lee, Maria Laimou-Geraniou, Jeong-Eun Oh, Kristin Olafsdottir, Kaitlyn Phung, Marco Pineda Castro, Magda Psichoudaki, Xueting Shao, Noelia Salgueiro-Gonzalez, Rafael Silva Feitosa, Cezar Silvino Gomes, Bikram Subedi, Arndís Sue Ching Löve, Nikolaos Thomaidis, Diana Tran, Alexander van Nuijs, Taja Verovšek, Degao Wang, Jason M. White, Viviane Yargeau, Ettore Zuccato, Jochen F. Mueller

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Other 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 20 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 5 11%
Environmental Science 4 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 9%
Engineering 3 7%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 23 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 102. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2023.
All research outputs
#443,546
of 26,577,771 outputs
Outputs from Water Research X
#3
of 141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,097
of 431,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Water Research X
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,577,771 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 141 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,315 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them