↓ Skip to main content

活性炭のイオン交換作用を利用したキャパシタハイブリッド型鉛蓄電池「UltraBattery」の開発と商品化

Overview of attention for article published in ADS, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
活性炭のイオン交換作用を利用したキャパシタハイブリッド型鉛蓄電池「UltraBattery」の開発と商品化
Published in
ADS, January 2016
DOI 10.5182/jaie.27.47
Authors

萩原 英貴, 柴田 智史, 赤阪 有一, 古川 淳

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2023.
All research outputs
#7,752,409
of 23,572,442 outputs
Outputs from ADS
#9,524
of 38,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,022
of 397,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ADS
#174
of 622 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,572,442 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 38,212 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,064 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 622 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.