↓ Skip to main content

ホエイペプチド配合流動食の腸管組織に対する効果

Overview of attention for article published in The Japanese Journal of SURGICAL METABOLISM and NUTRITION, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#40 of 132)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ホエイペプチド配合流動食の腸管組織に対する効果
Published in
The Japanese Journal of SURGICAL METABOLISM and NUTRITION, March 2023
DOI 10.11638/jssmn.57.1_22
Authors

芦田 欣也, 中村 健太郎

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2023.
All research outputs
#16,921,538
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from The Japanese Journal of SURGICAL METABOLISM and NUTRITION
#40
of 132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235,441
of 430,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Japanese Journal of SURGICAL METABOLISM and NUTRITION
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 132 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.