The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 76 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The energy–water limitation threshold explains divergent drought responses in tree growth, needle length, and stable isotope ratios
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Global Change Biology, May 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1111/gcb.16740 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joan Dudney, Andrew M. Latimer, Phillip van Mantgem, Harold Zald, Claire E. Willing, Jonathan C. B. Nesmith, Jennifer Cribbs, Elizabeth Milano |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 9% |
| India | 3 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Guinea | 1 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Congo, The Democratic Republic of the | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 58 | 76% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 47 | 62% |
| Scientists | 25 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 18% |
| Researcher | 5 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 10 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 27% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 21% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 9% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 110. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2023.
All research outputs
#408,422
of 26,557,909 outputs
Outputs from Global Change Biology
#446
of 6,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,219
of 404,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Change Biology
#7
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,557,909 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,764 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,668 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.