Fernando E Romero Galvan, Ryan Pavlick, Graham Trolley, Somil Aggarwal, Daniel Sousa, Charles Starr, Elisabeth Forrestel, Stephanie Bolton, Maria Del Mar Alsina, Nick Dokoozlian, Kaitlin M Gold
Abstract
The US wine and grape industry suffers $3B in damages and losses annually due to viral diseases such as Grapevine Leafroll-associated Virus Complex 3 (GLRaV-3). Current detection methods are labor intensive and expensive. GLRaV-3 undergoes a latent period in which the vines are infected but do not yet display visible symptoms, making it an ideal model to evaluate the scalability of imaging spectroscopy-based disease detection. We deployed the NASA Airborne Visible and Infrared Imaging Spectrometer Next Generation (AVIRIS-NG) to detect GLRaV-3 in Cabernet Sauvignon grapevines in Lodi, CA in September 2020. Foliage was removed from the vines as part of mechanical harvest soon after imagery acquisition. In both Sept. 2020 and 2021, industry collaborators scouted 317ac on a vine-by-vine basis for visible viral symptoms and collected a subset for molecular confirmation testing. Grapevines identified as visibly diseased in 2021, but not 2020, were assumed to have been latently infected at time of acquisition. We trained spectral models with random forest and synthetic minority oversampling technique to distinguish non-infected and GLRaV-3-infected grapevines. Non-infected and GLRaV-3 infected vines could be differentiated both pre- and post-symptomatically at 1m through 5m resolution. The best-performing models had 87% accuracy distinguishing between non-infected and asymptomatic vines, and 85% accuracy distinguishing between non-infected and asymptomatic + symptomatic vines. The importance of non-visible wavelengths suggests this capacity is driven by disease-induced changes to overall plant physiology. Our work sets a foundation for using the forthcoming hyperspectral satellite Surface Biology and Geology for regional disease monitoring.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 550. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2023.
All research outputs
#46,438
of 26,298,949 outputs
Outputs from Phytopathology
#1
of 3,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#980
of 363,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Phytopathology
#1
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,298,949 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,105 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
