↓ Skip to main content

マメ科の新帰化植物ヤナギバレンリソウ

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Japanese Botany, October 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#21 of 128)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
マメ科の新帰化植物ヤナギバレンリソウ
Published in
The Journal of Japanese Botany, October 2022
DOI 10.51033/jjapbot.78_2_9653
Authors

大橋広好, 五十嵐博

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2023.
All research outputs
#8,731,930
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Japanese Botany
#21
of 128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,625
of 445,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Japanese Botany
#4
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 128 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.