↓ Skip to main content

Basin-wide variation in tree hydraulic safety margins predicts the carbon balance of Amazon forests

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, April 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
25 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
220 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Basin-wide variation in tree hydraulic safety margins predicts the carbon balance of Amazon forests
Published in
Nature, April 2023
DOI 10.1038/s41586-023-05971-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julia Valentim Tavares, Rafael S. Oliveira, Maurizio Mencuccini, Caroline Signori-Müller, Luciano Pereira, Francisco Carvalho Diniz, Martin Gilpin, Manuel J. Marca Zevallos, Carlos A. Salas Yupayccana, Martin Acosta, Flor M. Pérez Mullisaca, Fernanda de V. Barros, Paulo Bittencourt, Halina Jancoski, Marina Corrêa Scalon, Beatriz S. Marimon, Imma Oliveras Menor, Ben Hur Marimon, Max Fancourt, Alexander Chambers-Ostler, Adriane Esquivel-Muelbert, Lucy Rowland, Patrick Meir, Antonio Carlos Lola da Costa, Alex Nina, Jesus M. B. Sanchez, Jose S. Tintaya, Rudi S. C. Chino, Jean Baca, Leticia Fernandes, Edwin R. M. Cumapa, João Antônio R. Santos, Renata Teixeira, Ligia Tello, Maira T. M. Ugarteche, Gina A. Cuellar, Franklin Martinez, Alejandro Araujo-Murakami, Everton Almeida, Wesley Jonatar Alves da Cruz, Jhon del Aguila Pasquel, Luís Aragāo, Timothy R. Baker, Plinio Barbosa de Camargo, Roel Brienen, Wendeson Castro, Sabina Cerruto Ribeiro, Fernanda Coelho de Souza, Eric G. Cosio, Nallaret Davila Cardozo, Richarlly da Costa Silva, Mathias Disney, Javier Silva Espejo, Ted R. Feldpausch, Leandro Ferreira, Leandro Giacomin, Niro Higuchi, Marina Hirota, Euridice Honorio, Walter Huaraca Huasco, Simon Lewis, Gerardo Flores Llampazo, Yadvinder Malhi, Abel Monteagudo Mendoza, Paulo Morandi, Victor Chama Moscoso, Robert Muscarella, Deliane Penha, Mayda Cecília Rocha, Gleicy Rodrigues, Ademir R. Ruschel, Norma Salinas, Monique Schlickmann, Marcos Silveira, Joey Talbot, Rodolfo Vásquez, Laura Vedovato, Simone Aparecida Vieira, Oliver L. Phillips, Emanuel Gloor, David R. Galbraith

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 220 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 128 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 17%
Student > Master 18 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 11%
Professor 9 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 41 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 27%
Environmental Science 28 22%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 50 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 314. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2024.
All research outputs
#115,483
of 26,513,654 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#7,691
of 100,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,912
of 421,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#177
of 1,089 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,513,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 100,791 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 103.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,056 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,089 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.