↓ Skip to main content

日本の機械工学の開拓者・井口在屋(II) 機械工学研究の軌跡をたどって

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Japan Society for the History of Industrial Technology, December 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
日本の機械工学の開拓者・井口在屋(II) 機械工学研究の軌跡をたどって
Published in
Journal of the Japan Society for the History of Industrial Technology, December 2022
DOI 10.57381/jshit.2.1_23
Authors

出水 力

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2023.
All research outputs
#8,731,930
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Japan Society for the History of Industrial Technology
#1
of 16 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,672
of 483,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Japan Society for the History of Industrial Technology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.4. This one scored the same or higher as 15 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 483,045 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them