↓ Skip to main content

TENSOR FIELDS AND CONNECTIONS ON CROSS-SECTIONS IN THE COTANGENT BUNDLE

Overview of attention for article published in Tohoku Mathematical Journal, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
TENSOR FIELDS AND CONNECTIONS ON CROSS-SECTIONS IN THE COTANGENT BUNDLE
Published in
Tohoku Mathematical Journal, March 2010
DOI 10.2748/tmj/1178243345
Authors

KENTARO YANO

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2023.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Tohoku Mathematical Journal
#12
of 71 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,826
of 104,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tohoku Mathematical Journal
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 71 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,151 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.