↓ Skip to main content

Timing of intubation and ICU mortality in COVID-19 patients: a retrospective analysis of 4198 critically ill patients during the first and second waves

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Anesthesiology, April 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 1,767)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
35 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Timing of intubation and ICU mortality in COVID-19 patients: a retrospective analysis of 4198 critically ill patients during the first and second waves
Published in
BMC Anesthesiology, April 2023
DOI 10.1186/s12871-023-02081-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sara Manrique, Laura Claverias, Mónica Magret, Joan Ramón Masclans, María Bodi, Sandra Trefler, Laura Canadell, Emili Díaz, Jordi Sole-Violan, Elena Bisbal-Andrés, Ruth González Natera, Antonio Albaya Moreno, Montserrat Vallverdu, Juan Carlos Ballesteros, Lorenzo Socias, Federico Gordo Vidal, Susana Sancho, Ignacio Martin-Loeches, Alejandro Rodriguez

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 4 10%
Researcher 3 7%
Unspecified 2 5%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 5%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 24 57%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 14%
Unspecified 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 25 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2024.
All research outputs
#921,631
of 26,505,350 outputs
Outputs from BMC Anesthesiology
#16
of 1,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,489
of 420,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Anesthesiology
#3
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,505,350 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,767 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,699 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.