The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Record Dispersal by a Wolf from Minnesota
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Mammalogy, February 1983
|
| DOI | 10.2307/1380772 |
| Authors |
Steven H. Fritts |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 18 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 16% |
| Unknown | 1 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 58% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 16% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 2 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 1997.
All research outputs
#8,537,346
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Mammalogy
#1,205
of 3,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,121
of 7,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Mammalogy
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,460 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 7,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.