The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Distribution of Late Cenozoic volcanic vents in the Cascade range: Volcanic arc segmentation and regional tectonic considerations
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Geophysical Research, September 2012
|
DOI | 10.1029/jb093ib06p06513 |
Authors |
Marianne Guffanti, Craig S. Weaver |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 44 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 13 | 29% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 27% |
Student > Master | 11 | 24% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 4% |
Professor | 2 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Unknown | 2 | 4% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 38 | 84% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 6 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2011.
All research outputs
#5,452,627
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Geophysical Research
#2,152
of 12,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,009
of 188,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Geophysical Research
#526
of 4,355 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,956 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,976 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,355 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.