The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Catastrophic isotopic modification of rhyolitic magma at times of caldera subsidence, Yellowstone Plateau Volcanic Field
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Geophysical Research, September 2012
|
DOI | 10.1029/jb089ib10p08339 |
Authors |
Wes Hildreth, Robert L. Christiansen, James R. O'Neil |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 61 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 27% |
Researcher | 12 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
Professor | 6 | 9% |
Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
Other | 11 | 17% |
Unknown | 5 | 8% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 46 | 72% |
Environmental Science | 4 | 6% |
Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
Linguistics | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 3% |
Unknown | 9 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 1987.
All research outputs
#8,543,833
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Geophysical Research
#4,083
of 12,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,582
of 188,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Geophysical Research
#1,137
of 4,355 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,956 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,976 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,355 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.