↓ Skip to main content

COMPARATIVE DEMOGRAPHY OF NEW WORLD POPULATIONS OF THRUSHES (TURDUS SPP.): COMMENT

Overview of attention for article published in Ecology, September 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
COMPARATIVE DEMOGRAPHY OF NEW WORLD POPULATIONS OF THRUSHES (TURDUS SPP.): COMMENT
Published in
Ecology, September 2005
DOI 10.1890/04-1799
Authors

Paul B. Conn, Paul F. Doherty, James D. Nichols

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
Spain 1 4%
Switzerland 1 4%
Unknown 22 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 28%
Student > Master 5 20%
Researcher 4 16%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Professor 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 3 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 72%
Environmental Science 3 12%
Unknown 4 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2005.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Ecology
#5,849
of 6,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,461
of 69,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology
#33
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,847 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.