↓ Skip to main content

Reconciling Carbon-cycle Concepts, Terminology, and Methods

Overview of attention for article published in Ecosystems, November 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Citations

dimensions_citation
957 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1559 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reconciling Carbon-cycle Concepts, Terminology, and Methods
Published in
Ecosystems, November 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10021-005-0105-7
Authors

F. S. Chapin, G. M. Woodwell, J. T. Randerson, E. B. Rastetter, G. M. Lovett, D. D. Baldocchi, D. A. Clark, M. E. Harmon, D. S. Schimel, R. Valentini, C. Wirth, J. D. Aber, J. J. Cole, M. L. Goulden, J. W. Harden, M. Heimann, R. W. Howarth, P. A. Matson, A. D. McGuire, J. M. Melillo, H. A. Mooney, J. C. Neff, R. A. Houghton, M. L. Pace, M. G. Ryan, S. W. Running, O. E. Sala, W. H. Schlesinger, E.-D. Schulze

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,559 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 30 2%
Spain 9 <1%
Brazil 8 <1%
Germany 8 <1%
United Kingdom 7 <1%
Canada 6 <1%
Mexico 5 <1%
Japan 4 <1%
France 4 <1%
Other 22 1%
Unknown 1456 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 338 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 322 21%
Student > Master 211 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 90 6%
Professor 88 6%
Other 267 17%
Unknown 243 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 549 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 372 24%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 205 13%
Engineering 32 2%
Social Sciences 10 <1%
Other 58 4%
Unknown 333 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2024.
All research outputs
#4,524,476
of 26,052,823 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystems
#356
of 1,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,652
of 169,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystems
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,052,823 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,332 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,674 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.