↓ Skip to main content

The current status of FLASH particle therapy: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine, May 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The current status of FLASH particle therapy: a systematic review
Published in
Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine, May 2023
DOI 10.1007/s13246-023-01266-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jake Atkinson, Eva Bezak, Hien Le, Ivan Kempson

Abstract

Particle therapies are becoming increasingly available clinically due to their beneficial energy deposition profile, sparing healthy tissues. This may be further promoted with ultra-high dose rates, termed FLASH. This review comprehensively summarises current knowledge based on studies relevant to proton- and carbon-FLASH therapy. As electron-FLASH literature presents important radiobiological findings that form the basis of proton and carbon-based FLASH studies, a summary of key electron-FLASH papers is also included. Preclinical data suggest three key mechanisms by which proton and carbon-FLASH are able to reduce normal tissue toxicities compared to conventional dose rates, with equipotent, or enhanced, tumour kill efficacy. However, a degree of caution is needed in clinically translating these findings as: most studies use transmission and do not conform the Bragg peak to tumour volume; mechanistic understanding is still in its infancy; stringent verification of dosimetry is rarely provided; biological assays are prone to limitations which need greater acknowledgement.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 3 10%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 16 53%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 6 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Engineering 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 16 53%