↓ Skip to main content

Farmland practices are driving bird population decline across Europe

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, May 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#40 of 105,278)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
183 news outlets
blogs
8 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3568 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
reddit
9 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
130 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
280 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Farmland practices are driving bird population decline across Europe
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, May 2023
DOI 10.1073/pnas.2216573120
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stanislas Rigal, Vasilis Dakos, Hany Alonso, Ainārs Auniņš, Zoltán Benkő, Lluís Brotons, Tomasz Chodkiewicz, Przemysław Chylarecki, Elisabetta de Carli, Juan Carlos del Moral, Cristian Domşa, Virginia Escandell, Benoît Fontaine, Ruud Foppen, Richard Gregory, Sarah Harris, Sergi Herrando, Magne Husby, Christina Ieronymidou, Frédéric Jiguet, John Kennedy, Alena Klvaňová, Primož Kmecl, Lechosław Kuczyński, Petras Kurlavičius, John Atle Kålås, Aleksi Lehikoinen, Åke Lindström, Romain Lorrillière, Charlotte Moshøj, Renno Nellis, David Noble, Daniel Palm Eskildsen, Jean-Yves Paquet, Mathieu Pélissié, Clara Pladevall, Danae Portolou, Jiří Reif, Hans Schmid, Benjamin Seaman, Zoltán D. Szabo, Tibor Szép, Guido Tellini Florenzano, Norbert Teufelbauer, Sven Trautmann, Chris van Turnhout, Zdeněk Vermouzek, Thomas Vikstrøm, Petr Voříšek, Anne Weiserbs, Vincent Devictor

Abstract

Declines in European bird populations are reported for decades but the direct effect of major anthropogenic pressures on such declines remains unquantified. Causal relationships between pressures and bird population responses are difficult to identify as pressures interact at different spatial scales and responses vary among species. Here, we uncover direct relationships between population time-series of 170 common bird species, monitored at more than 20,000 sites in 28 European countries, over 37 y, and four widespread anthropogenic pressures: agricultural intensification, change in forest cover, urbanisation and temperature change over the last decades. We quantify the influence of each pressure on population time-series and its importance relative to other pressures, and we identify traits of most affected species. We find that agricultural intensification, in particular pesticides and fertiliser use, is the main pressure for most bird population declines, especially for invertebrate feeders. Responses to changes in forest cover, urbanisation and temperature are more species-specific. Specifically, forest cover is associated with a positive effect and growing urbanisation with a negative effect on population dynamics, while temperature change has an effect on the dynamics of a large number of bird populations, the magnitude and direction of which depend on species' thermal preferences. Our results not only confirm the pervasive and strong effects of anthropogenic pressures on common breeding birds, but quantify the relative strength of these effects stressing the urgent need for transformative changes in the way of inhabiting the world in European countries, if bird populations shall have a chance of recovering.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3,568 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 280 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 280 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 55 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 11%
Student > Master 21 8%
Other 20 7%
Student > Bachelor 14 5%
Other 37 13%
Unknown 103 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 73 26%
Environmental Science 51 18%
Unspecified 5 2%
Engineering 5 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 1%
Other 24 9%
Unknown 118 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3785. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2024.
All research outputs
#1,443
of 26,588,565 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#40
of 105,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35
of 405,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#1
of 842 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,588,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 105,278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 842 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.