↓ Skip to main content

文字式の計算順序に関する指導 : 「かけ算記号省略優先」規則に焦点を当てて

Overview of attention for article published in 静岡大学教育実践総合センター紀要, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
文字式の計算順序に関する指導 : 「かけ算記号省略優先」規則に焦点を当てて
Published in
静岡大学教育実践総合センター紀要, March 2016
DOI 10.14945/00009429
Authors

啓之 熊倉

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2023.
All research outputs
#16,464,459
of 25,992,468 outputs
Outputs from 静岡大学教育実践総合センター紀要
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,649
of 313,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age from 静岡大学教育実践総合センター紀要
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,992,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,595 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them