The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Efficacy and Safety of 0.01% and 0.02% Atropine for the Treatment of Pediatric Myopia Progression Over 3 Years
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Ophthalmology, October 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2023.2097 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Karla Zadnik, Erica Schulman, Ian Flitcroft, Jennifer S. Fogt, Louis C. Blumenfeld, Tung M. Fong, Eric Lang, Houman D. Hemmati, Simon P. Chandler, Carol Aune, Isabel Ayet, Darren J. Bell, Marie Bodack, Jeffrey Colburn, Sue Cotter, Annegret Dahlmann-Noor, Stephen Glaser, James Hoekel, Daniel Iacono, Erin Jenewein, Caroline Klaver, Stephen Lichtenstein, Chunming Liu, James Loughman, Zoltan Nagy, Matthew Paul, Melanie Schmitt, David Silbert, Sarah Singh, Daniel Twelker, Fuensanta Vera-Diaz, Dorothy Wang, Colin Willoughby, Nikki Buck, Michelle Bailey, Wayne Schuck, Leo Ballering, Robert Spiegel, Tuyen Ong, Milagros Nadal, Michelle Novello, John Kappelhof, Nestor Gonzalez, Gregory Larkin, Kenneth Somberg, Ann Killian, John Castellana, Stephen Crockett |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 2 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
| Poland | 1 | 3% |
| Peru | 1 | 3% |
| Paraguay | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 29 | 78% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 16% |
| Scientists | 3 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 9% |
| Researcher | 5 | 9% |
| Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 27 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 33% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 27 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 969. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2024.
All research outputs
#18,234
of 26,557,909 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Ophthalmology
#13
of 6,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#392
of 373,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Ophthalmology
#1
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,557,909 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,830 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,154 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.